June 28, 2004

Another reminder why Steven Harper is bad for Canada

Ten reasons not to vote for Stephen Harper.

Angry at the Liberals? Be careful what you wish for, says former Ontario Deputy Secretary.

Dateline: Friday, June 25, 2004

Dear Friend:

I know that many people are contemplating voting Conservative because they are mad at the Liberals and because Stephen Harper is coming across as a reasonable guy. All this is understandable, but I believe that the real Stephen Harper and the real Conservative policies are bad for Canada and our future. Below I have listed my top ten reasons for not voting Conservative. If you think this list is worth considering before you decide how to vote, please send a copy on to a few friends.

Michael Mendelson

P.S. This is NOT a sponsored political advertisement: I just wanted to make a list for myself but when I showed it to a few others they suggested that it would be useful to circulate. ============================================================================

Ten reasons not to vote Conservative

1. The Conservatives will withdraw from Canada's agreement to the Kyoto Accord on climate change. This will have serious effects for Canada's standing in the global community, not to say the world's effort to reduce global warming. If you have children or grandchildren, be worried. There is no greater threat to their future well-being than climate change.

2. The Conservative fiscal plan does not add up. It will leave Canada once again with a huge deficit by making tax cuts we cannot afford. The Conservatives can only balance their budget with several billion dollars in cuts to other government programs, according to studies by the CD Howe institute and the Bank of Nova Scotia. Ten years later, the Conservative fiscal plan will mean higher taxes to pay the debt they accumulate.

3. The Conservatives main 'social' plank is a $2000 child tax deduction. This would provide no benefits at all to low income families, such as a single mother working at minimum wage, but would provide about $1,160 to a single earner making $200,000 a year. The cost of this proposal is about $3.5 billion, and it will also cost the provinces about $1.75 billion - every year! The Conservative platform does not acknowledge the cost to the provinces. This $5+ billion a year could almost end child poverty in Canada if it were put into the existing National Child Benefit. 4. Stephen Harper wrote an article and made numerous statements advocating Canada's participation in the war in Iraq. His current disavowal of his own position shows that he is not willing to be straightforward with the public and accept responsibility on a difficult issue. His stand in favour of Canada's participation shows that he does not value Canada's long-standing support for the United Nations and multilateral international institutions.

5. Stephen Harper's main advisor, Tom Flanagan, who is likely to be his Chief of Staff and very influential in Ottawa, has written a book (First Nations, Second Thoughts) on Aboriginal issues that has caused deep distress in Canada's Aboriginal community. Essentially, Flanagan argues against any 'special recognition' of Aboriginal people. Many members of the Conservative caucus have taken similar positions. A Conservative government will attempt to set the clock back on Aboriginal issues, and will cause great tensions with Canada's Aboriginal peoples - our most vulnerable community.

6. Stephen Harper has said that he will allow free votes on private member bills. It is virtually certain that a private member will sponsor a bill to reduce women's right to choose. In a Parliament dominated by Conservatives such a bill could pass, but even if it does not it will cause a divisive and disturbing campaign. Other issues likely to come forward include capital punishment and perhaps other socially conservative issues.

7. The Supreme Court has two vacancies now and will shortly have a third vacancy. Appointments can be made at the will of the Prime Minister, even in a minority government. Stephen Harper is likely to select extreme conservatives for these positions, and this will have an impact on Canada for many decades, long after his government is defeated.

8. Stephen Harper has refused to take a stand against privatization of health care. He only says that services must be publicly funded. Stephen Harper will not stand up to Ralph Klein; to whom many in his caucus owe debts for political support. But private health care will add to costs for Canada and threaten our health, as has been shown in several academic studies, including studies recently published in the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine. Once we introduce private delivery it will be expensive and difficult to go back to a public system, as private providers will have to be compensated.

9. The Conservatives have no articulated policy to assist Canada's cities, where 80% of the population lives. Canada's cities are the foundation of our economic growth, but their infrastructure is crumbling. The mayors of Canada's cities took the unprecedented step of asking Canadians not to vote for the Conservatives.

10. Many members of the Conservative caucus argue for an American style 'right to bear arms' and do not support any type of gun registry. Stephen Harper has not spoken out in favour of gun control. He criticizes the Liberal's registry, but typically does not say what he will do, if anything.


June 26, 2004

For anyone who read my previous blog

for June 24th... I changed my mind again.. I don't know who I'm going to vote for :)

June 16, 2004

Dublin

Today is Bloomsday

What is it?
James Joyce's Ulysses is set in Dublin on June 16, 1904 - 'Bloomsday', for the novel's everyman anti-hero, Leopold Bloom, who wanders the city. The Bloomsday tradition began in 1954 when a group of Dublin writers set out to visit all the landmarks mentioned in the book, reconstruct its events and down a few pints.
From: http://books.guardian.co.uk/quiz/questions/0,5957,507048,00.html

June 15, 2004

English Language Debate

How annoying they all are.

Not to sound like a brat, but I can't believe these are my choices. Conservative American Lovin' suit. A Conservative Liberal suit. And a talk-to-much socialist suit. This debate actually made we want to move to Quebec and vote for the Bloc.

I gotta tell you that there really was no clear winner. Voters certainly learned nothing. I don't remember a debate so boring. Of course I gave up after an hour of bickering. I never could figure out if anyway had an agenda other then evading questions or blaming Paul Martin for the Sponsorship Scandal.

I think that one thing that I was worried about. Harper's conservatives don't want to tell the truth about their platform. That is they don't want to say what they'd really do if they formed a government because most of their ideas would be unpopular.

What I don't understand is why the babyboomers support this guy. Harper's conservative would get rid of much of the services that the babyboomers are going to need in the next 10-30 years. They're crazy if they think a Harper government will or wants to take care of them.

Also the idea of ChildCare came up. Now I also was disappointed that the Liberals hadn't made good on their promise of a National Child Care plan, but once again the Conservatives scare me. Tax Credits. Now seriously these never work Because quite simply the more money you make the more of the tax credit you earn. Then what if you are a single parent living below the poverty line. How would a tax credit help you? It won't. You won't see any benefit because you don't pay taxes. Harper basically said that he won't give money to the provinces for Child Care, so if you're really poor you'll simply be out of luck and won't be able to put your child into a decent day care. Remember they are no longer progressive they're just conservative.

Anyway I will have many more thoughts on this as the election looms ever closer :)

June 07, 2004

Save Me From Tomorrow

Speaking of the Reagan Era...The year this song was written is 1986. I haven't heard this song for years and I just dug up my Greenpeace album. I think this song is as appropriate now as it was then. (although there are a few from that album I could post here, this one spoke to me the most today)

World Party - Ship of Fools

We're setting sail
To the place on the map
From which no one has ever returned
Drawn by the promise of the joker and the fool
By the light of the crosses that burn
Drawn by the promise of the women and the lace
And the gold and the cotton and pearls
It's the place where they keep all the darkness you need
You sail away from the light of the world
On this trip, baby

You will pay tomorrow
You gonna pay tomorrow
You will pay tomorrow

CHORUS:
Save me
Save me from tomorrow
I don't want to sail in this ship of fools
Save me
Save me from tomorrow
I don't want to sail in this ship of fools

I want to run and hide
Right now...

Avarice and greed
Are gonna drive you over the endless sea
They will leave you drifting in the shallows
Or drowning in the oceans of history
Traveling the world
You're in search of no good
But I'm sure you'll build your Sodom
Like you knew you would
Using all the good people
For your galley slaves
As your little boat struggles
Through the warning waves

But you don't pay
You will pay tomorrow
You gonna pay tomorrow
You gonna pay tomorrow

(CHORUS)

Where's it coming from?
Where's it going to?
It's just a ship of fools...

Reagan dies

Ronnie Reagan has died. First I have to say that Alzheimer's disease is a horrible and awful disease. It is most hard on the caregivers.

Anyway the moment that defines Ronald Reagan for me was him and Brian Mulroney sing "when Irish Eyes are Smiling" to celebrate the beginning of the creation of the Free Trade agreement. I was a young teen and thought are they celebrating the giving away of the country. Selling our soul to the US.

CBC Archive Story on Free Trade

I have had little respect for Reagan. His gov't intensified the Red Scare, Nuclear tensions, and we all know the Star Wars legacy (GWB is trying it again). When I was in High School I had a great Social Studies teacher who, when he discovered my absolute disdain for Reagonomics told me, look up Grenada and you'll be horrified. So I did a research paper on it and I was. Here's an article that might help.

http://www.uri.edu/personal/cha6734u/grenada1.htm


Anyway I do feel for the family of Reagan, it is a horrible thing to happen, and to live so long with it. It is ironic, though, to hear Nancy Reagan speak of Stem Cell research. Wasn't she Anti-Choice??

Anyway the link is to Greg Palast's website. Read his thoughts on Reagan.



June 02, 2004

Diet news 2 - Canadians thinner

Obesity rates higher in U.S. than Canada: Study


CANADIAN PRESS

OTTAWA - When it comes to obesity, American women tip the scales compared to their Canadian sisters, a cross-border health study confirms for the first time.
Overall, 21 per cent of Americans were obese compared with 15 per cent of Canadians, says the study released today by Statistics Canada and the U.S. National Center for Health Statistics.

And one in five American women reported they were obese, compared with one in eight Canadian women.

Previous research has suggested obesity may be more prevalent in the United States, but this is the first definitive confirmation, said Diane Finegood, a scientific director of the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR).

"Whenever I go down there I think, God, there really is a difference, but this is in fact the first data I'm aware of where a survey was done at the same time in Canada and the United States with the same questions and the same methodology by the same people," said Finegood.

U.S. women were also more likely to suffer severe mobility problems than those in Canada. Seven per cent of the American females reported they could not walk, stand or climb, compared with four per cent of their Canadian counterparts.

The study does not explain the differences between the two countries, although Finegood said it might have to do with different levels of physical activity.

In both countries, poor people were more likely to report health problems, but the difference between rich and poor was much greater in the United States.

Thirty-one per cent of Americans in the lowest income group reported their health was only fair or poor, versus 23 per cent of low-income Canadians.

"Americans in the poorest income quintile report fair or poor health, obesity and severe mobility impairment more frequently than their Canadian counterparts," says the study.

The great majority in both countries - 88 per cent of Canadians and 85 per cent of Americans - considered themselves in good, very good or excellent health.

The similar levels of satisfaction are surprising since Americans spend proportionately more on health, said Morris Barer, Scientific Director of CIHR's Institute of Health Services and Policy Research.

"The general impression I took away from this is Americans seem more satisfied to be spending a lot more money than Canadians to get equivalent health status."

In both countries, roughly 10 per cent of the population report having unmet health needs, but most Americans cite cost as the main barrier to care while the Canadians tend to blame waiting lists.

Americans with medical insurance were more satisfied with their health system than Canadians, but Americans who did not have insurance - 11 per cent of the U.S. population - were less satisfied than Canadians, who have universal health care.


Diet news 1 - don't yo-yo

Yo-yo diets may hurt immune system
Last Updated Wed, 02 Jun 2004 18:48:23
SEATTLE - Yo-yo dieters who repeatedly lose and then regain weight may be harming their immune system, a new study suggests.

Researchers interviewed 114 overweight but otherwise healthy postmenopausal women about their weight-loss during the past 20 years.

Women with a history of yo-yo diets had weaker immune systems, they reported in the June issue of the Journal of the American Dietetic Association.
(click on the title bar for complete article)


Basically its a reminder that fad diets don't work and that people should work hard to maintain a healthy weight.

You know I do think that the one thing WW has made me figure out is that like smoking the choice to lose weight is better done when one is ready. Also its about learning how to live a healthy lifestyle.